Best x265 encoder reddit Now on Sonarr, I can just put their name on the release profile and give them a score. Here are the latest SVT-AV1 benchmarks. h265 (hevc) is actually about two times as efficient with its data vs its block compression, so you should be able to set it a little lower than the h264 (AVC) is running - the talk of the town is that you should be able to set it to half of the original h. 265 "Main" is the default. Reply reply More replies More replies. But then you have additional profiles for supporting additional decoder capabilities like higher colour depth (10, 12 or 16 bit), less subsampling (4:2:2 or 4:4:4) or intra-constrained (mainly for editing, as it's not efficient). x265 isn't as "fire and forget" an encoder as x264. Best x265 encoders . 7gb DVD to as small as 700mb or go big and leave it in its original format. I personally think that AV1 QSV outshines x265, but mainly in brighter scenes. It also talks about Intel QSV as if it's a good option. The Best Community for Modding and Upgrading Arcade1Up’s Home Arcade Game Cabinets, A1Up Jr. Faster presets encode faster but will result in even bigger output file. Set the encoder to x265 (or x265 10-bit/12-bit depending on your source video). Davincis h264/h265 encoders are bad, so it's better to export DNxHR and use a good encoder like ffmpeg (Shutter encoder or Handbrake are GUI front ends). x265 will probably do better, but I doubt it can keep up in real time. uploaders like Shannig, RMTeam, MZABI. It will be significantly faster than CPU conversion with x265. Since trying out GPU encoding I'm able to get a movie done in an hour and I'm very happy with the quality/filesize output. What are the best settings for this in tdarr? Probably don't need anything fancy, and all are in 1080p - wish to keep quality as close to original file as possible The SVT-AV1 encoder presets are pretty reasonably spaced out in encoding time and quality for size, like x264 encoder presets are. What’s an acceptable encode time for you? And how much does output quality matter? She's been a part of UTR for years. I've had several friends and family blindly compare several encodes and some even picked QSV AV1 over SVT-AV1 on some encodes, but no one picked x265. (for 10bit) The hardware version isn't very good, but the same settings in software via media encoder are usually great. If they're just remuxed Blu-rays, you can get big size savings without the extreme slowness of x265 by using x264 on the HQ 1080p presets. When Good encodes takes time Yeah, but efficiency is also a thing. After doing a few experiments playing around with quality, encoder tune, etc. When choosing a hardware encoder you are always choosing speed over efficiency. 1 and 5. Tigole/QxR should only be used if your device can handle x265. The megathread of r/Piracy and r/FreeMediaHeckYeah has a nice collection of sites and cse. I took a I am also interested in the best compromise between speed and quality, personally I am interested in UHD encoding in H265, from what I understand software encoding turns out x265 can provide / is designed for better video quality with smaller file sizes. 265 (x265) Framerate (FPS): same as source/variable Encoder Preset: Medium Encoder Tune: None Encoder Profile: Auto Encoder Level: Auto Constant Quality: 20 RF I disabled all filters as they falsely triggered in a past encoding. You also don't use HM as reference encoder for H265 but x265 as that is the production encoder. Especially in low bitrates. For all other purpses -preset slow is you best bet. Hmmm. " can ". I use Davinci resolve to edit my videos. Yes it is, and i voiced mine. View community ranking In the Top 5% of largest communities on Reddit. Then adjust the RF target up a few points at a time until you find the quality vs size tradeoff that best suits your preference. Do you know any other groups/encoders that use similar quality/size ratio than my extinguished beloved RARBG? I know that their bitrates were not the best, but for me it is more convinient I make 1080p x265 encodes that are comparable to RARBG, but my system prefers ac3 to aac, and I keep my bitrate a bit lower usually, less it's film (noisy image, lots of static). My understanding of RF was that, given a CRF, it will maintain that quality regardless of bitrate. Also tell me the best blueray uploaders I don't use x265 because it takes more to process than other codecs, but the knowledge that x265 is just fine with a slightly higher quality setting than x264, is helpful to pass onto others. x265: These are the Raw Results for the x265 Encoder 10-bit is clearly the way to go! As you can see 10bit is the winner, if it comes to quality and Bitrate savings. You shouldn't use encoder tune Animation, because it makes the quality worse and preset medium or slow would be better than fast. I’ve done the absolute best settings I can using NVENC x265 and it still comes out looking worse than even a mediocre software x265 encode. , Virtual Pinball tables, Countercades, Casinocades, Partycades, Projectorcade, Giant Joysticks, Infinity Game Table, Casinocade, Actioncade, and Plug & Play devices. Is "slow" preset worth the huge increase in encode time? comments sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A Add a Comment Hi all, whats the current general opinion/state of play when it comes to H265 encoding, especially for 4K video. 265 (Nvidia NVEnc) or CPU encoding (H. cr Reply reply DavidOBE • No love for tigole? Reply reply d4nm3d • Tigole is part of QXR. BEST trackers for x265 torrents (Movies & TV)? I've been looking around for good trackers ever since extratorrents shutted down. Nvenc uses Nvidia's hardware accelerated NVENC encoder. Well if this isn't an interesting result?! Note that the Source File is 4:2:2. Maybe it would be even better to convert to AV1 but since all devices and servers I'm owning are having HW support for x265 I figured I'd convert everything into that for now. Anything over 2k for bitrate can make my system Hi. It is taking me 20 mins to process this in handbrake for a 34 minute long 20GB file. Here's the full rundown on my 1080 Blu Ray settings: Video Encoder - H. Only below preset 4 aomenc is worth it. Something can be consistently mediocre, but it is still consistent. Now on my current Nvidia card, the NVENC encoder looks very similar to the X264 encoding but without as much of a performance hit. x264 is just as good for quality DVD encodes and way faster. The bitrates will be relatively less and you can get decent sized movies there at your range. Try a couple encoder presets to find one that's slightly faster than your typical encode fps on your specific CPU (SVT-AV1 can make great use of AVX/2/512, moreso than x265 does, so it varies depending on CPU). 1 audio), you may end up liking x265. I think CRF 20 still looks pretty good while making the filesize small (200-350 MB). Though it's also very opinionated against x265 for 1080p content, with the argument that the quality is trash. This Graph shows that the reference AV1 Encoder is the best one so far. I find it hard to discount x265 though, as the space savings are very impressive for very little quality drop (3GB vs 600MB for a single TV episode). So if you are willing to invest the time then use software I'm currently using handbrake to encode remuxes to x265. This goes out to all the 3D movie lovers and especially users of a Quest 2 and BD3D2MK3D or similar programs I'm not aware of yet. X265 Parameters. Just my experience with x265. This one is probably the toughest to decode, as it takes a little guesswork. All decoders which can decode h. But remember not every cpu can handle smoothly x265 decoding. 265 10-bit (x265) - Framerate: Same as source, Constant Framerate - Constant Quality: 20RF - Encoder I've learned x264 for content that doesn't move much (podcasting or fairly stationary games like say Hearthstone), AMD/Nvidia encoder for content with a lot of motion ( I use Rocket League as a test for this). I'm trying to test conversion of a 500MB file using this command line: I've made some encodes look much better by reencoding this way. I typically reencode blurays at x265 crf18 slow, but for some problematic films I have to run some test encodes on a clip to figure out what's best. Aomenc or other encoder might be better if you are going to a high resolution or don’t have many cores. For anime without film grain: - Container: MKV - CODEC: H. S02E01. 265 (Nvidia NVEnc), Encoder Preset: Slow, Encoder Level & Profile: Auto. Which encoder is better for that? Let me know thanks!-I use a 6800 XT GPU, and have a 5900X CPU AV1 isn’t ready for prime time, none of the encoders are as mature as x265 is. Look at screenshots and see what you like. For higher quality Similar to my post in r/Sonarr, but for radarr. I prefer good x265 encoders like QXR, UTR, HashMiner, etc, Releases from these people usually are larger but at least these people don't hide details about their releases and maintain their release over a long time. The different settings / encoders affect the three corners of the encoding triangle. However, when I compared the same RF between Fast and Slow preset, the quality was quite different. Is there a tool (Win or Linux) that doesn't touch the video files in any other way than just I have some footage from trips and wanted to find the best way to encode them to HEVC with speed and quality. That being said, EposVox did a comparison of quality between Turing NVENC and x265 a few months ago, and the NVENC encoder produced very good quality conversions, not to mention that it's very fast. Now, with its loss I really feel like an orphan. 70's and 80's films tend to encode poorly for that reason. 265 will support it. -x264 was around 18-20 I usually use x264 but decided to start playing around with x265 (1080p file source). I would not re-encode from x264 to x265 (or vice versa), that would But in all cases I compared any x265 to x264 release (not only the mini encodes) I've observed that the x265 are always more "blurry" (it's not by much). Also BvS rips or MegaDDL. If it were 50,0,50 you might go x265 slow at RF23. Judge an encode by the encode I've seen their releases appear on 1337x and ETTV, Joy is another awesome x265 encoder crazy4tv. Do you know any other groups/encoders that use similar quality/size ratio than my extinguished beloved RARBG? They always try to hide information regarding the Audio quality. 100 Comment : After. Another dilemma i often have is deciding whether to download a vyndros Blu-ray season pack vs a x264 Blu-ray season pack from rovers, shortbred, etc. 264 (AVC) and H. It constantly monitors the Plex media directories and when it detects a new file it scans it, removes nonstandard metadata, converts subs to srt, removes any audio streams I tell it to (mostly foreign languages, but commentary can also be removed if desired) reorders streams within the container, transcodes from whatever View community ranking In the Top 5% of largest communities on Reddit. 265 AMD-VCE FPS: Same as source Constant Quality: 22 QP. Apple ProRes (via FFmpeg) Record in one of the best supported intermediate formats for video editors in OBS Studio! (Requires a powerful CPU) AV1 (via AOM) The future of video encoding is here with the software AV1 encoder from AOMedia! I’m currently encoding my concert DVDs/Blu-rays in x264 using the tff=1 flag to keep them interlaced, then letting Infuse deinterlace them on-the-fly during playback. Hi! More than 90% of my movies library (8000 films) are RARBG x265 1080p encodes (and VXT for foreings). Commercial AV1 encoders are better than the open source ones; there’s not really a x264/x265 equivalent top shelf open source encoder for AV1. Reply reply DavidOBE • Didn't know. On the other hand, the big downfall of NVENC is that it's always done so at the cost of much larger filesizes, so someone will have to re-evaluate -For offline recordings i use X265 which is quick and gets the job done -NVENC latest version is better than VCN for X264. AV1 encoders have been more computationally complex and slower. 265 (x265)", and all other settings remained the same. true. I'm using windows 10 and was wondering if handbrake does a great job or if there is something better out there I Look at the doc of x265 : "When you use faster presets, the encoder takes shortcuts to improve performance at the expense of quality and compression efficiency. The RARBG rips are bottom of the barrel as far as x265 goes - low bitrate for both 1080p and 4k, really bad audio for the 1080p ones and heavy degrain for the 4k ones. Looking forward to it being added to HB, but until then it is out of scope for this Plus the h. Ember and neo-hevc are good to. You need to play with the quality slider in handbrake, otherwise you can end up with very small but terrible looking content, or overly huge content that isn't any better looking than you could get A good standard is AVC/x264 at veryslow with RF 18 and audio either passthrough or FLAC so it stays lossless (flac is smaller than blueray lossless options like dts-hd ma or trueHD) If you need a smaller file size just change the codec to HEVC/x265 though that H. x265 encoding takes a lot of cpu time, meaning weeks, for 10-50 movies, that's IF you want to take the most out of it. 265 10-bit, CRF18, preset slow, main10@L5. So anything she has released in the last few years and anything she releases in the future (Until UTR ceases to exist) will be under UTR. It's true that for x264 and x265 using frame-based multithreading there are diminishing returns above 6 cores, but it doesn't mean that you get no benefit from the extra cores/threads at all - and the CPUs with those high core counts can At the start of this year i wanted to finally get around to build my personal top movie collection on my external 4tb hdd, funnily enough i was taking it slow until rarbg closed, thank god for alternatives (shout out r/therarbg). 1 or 7. Trying to understand the encoder options more- ripping DVD collection At DVD resolutions a modern CPU will be pretty quick at x265 encoding. Preset 8 should provide similar efficiency as x265 placebo at about the same speed as x265 medium. They encode from BD Remux, so quality is good, plus, like your Chest hair, there's always extras included in the encode. 41. I understand that this ffmpeg doesn't "come with" x265, but I figured there'd be people here with experience in Skip to main content Open menu Open navigation Go to Reddit Home The folks suggesting hardware encoding have clearly never properly seen the difference especially when it comes to grainy films. 1 GPU: GeForce RTX 3090 Encoding Time: ~30 minutes File Size: 18. If you have an Nvidia GPU, use the AV1 NVENC encoder for fast Who are the best x265 encoders that aren't tigole or qxr? Or lesser known ones that make good quality? I assume they might be in private I've been searching through reddit and various forums for the whole day and I'm very confused on why people think nvenc looks very bad compared to x265 encode. Anime releases are all over the place with varying bitrates and encoders. So I'm looking to stay around 5 but yeah, will probably need to increase the constant quality compared to x265 (I had previously heard the opposite). Reply reply techsnapp My go-to, currently encoding The Matrix 4K with DV/HDR10: H. Our goal is to provide a space for like-minded people to help each other, share ideas and grow projects involving TP-Link products from the United States. 265 10-bits encoder was set at "Slow" preset as it is my current 'sweet-spot' for archiving with x265. Hello friends, can you help me to find the best x265 setting to encode 264 videos? sorry guys, i still new for ffmpeg Hi! More than 90% of my movies library (8000 films) are RARBG x265 1080p encodes (and VXT for foreings). You could compress a 4. This thread is archived New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast comments sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A [deleted] • Additional comment actions I’m looking to transcode my current movie library of 1080p remux files (mostly mkv) to x265 versions to save some space. Just make sure you have set the right selection behaviours for audio and subtitles, before adding all tracks to your queue. Question: I did some close up comparisons of the videos, and the quality of the x265 file is pretty comparable to what NVENC produced. For both, the x265 rf I picked was 20, but because of denoising and adaptive quatization, average QP ended up 25. h. NVENC on 20 series and newer cards under x. Re-encoding is essentially lossy, it's H265 is simply a better compression method than H264. Walter - No Idea And if Topaz Video 3. Getting it done right at the source is always best. I want to re-encode them to x265 so they'll take up less space. Does anyone know the encoder settings RARBG uses for their 1080p 265 releases or how to replicate these settings? After. I wouldn’t use x265 for DVD unless you’re going for very low bitrates. The encoding is done by a bot with the same encoding settings for every film with no adjustments on a film by film basis. Psarips,rmteam,bvs. View community ranking In the Top 10% of largest communities on Reddit. It doesn't even mention the encoder used. Also, the video files are being outputted at ~50mbps bitrate even though the orginal file is ~90mbps. In h. They didn't take a lot of space and quality was very decent. 264 (NVENC), Quality at 0, Slowest Encoder preset, Profile high and level 6. The only place I've really seen noticeable quality loss is in scenes that have a lot of small details, like cameras panning across vegetation/trees. Currently using the Very Fast 1080p and changing fps to same as source, using . H265 is simply a better compression method than H264. SVT is as fast as x265 medium while offering a better compression. Audio always to EAC3 Encoding from an encode, is Not a good idea. I don't use x264 10bit, but for x265 it's better to encode in 10 bit, even if the source is 8 bit : the files are smaller and the 10 bit version stores the colors in a better way and you will have less banding colors problems. Switch the encoder to SVT-AV1. If you want, get x265. 264 software on slow setting, though it will lag behind software x. These are the Raw Results for the x265 Encoder 10-bit is clearly the way to go If you have an Nvidia GPU, use NVENC for H265 conversion. I'm not sure what they're basing that on. What is the most cost-efficient rig I could set up? For best results, VBR encoding requires two or more passes, which allows the encoder to scan the source content to make optimal decisions upon subsequent passes of where to best allocate bits within the encoded sequence. Is there a tool (Win or Linux) that doesn't touch the video files in any other 12 votes, 13 comments. I would almost always pick a Vyndros encode over D3G or anyone else unless it's significantly larger. Personally I would get higher quality encodes for a tv, but thats a personal preference thing which depends on my personal eyes and quality standard. A highly tuned automated pipeline, encoding on a 32-core CPU at slow settings could be faster than some manual setup on a 4-core CPU at faster settings. I’m about to encode my collection of concerts to save some space on my NAS. It seems x265 is the best AV1 NVENC was the clear winner with faster compression speeds, comparable file size, and better quality. Between the ones you usually find in sites like nyaa for weekly series (judas, ssa, yui, asw, etc) which one is the best quality wise? The file sizes are pretty similar, but I wondered if there's I advise you to encode using software encoders (x264, x265) as hardware encoders (atleast NVEC does) have larger file sizes. Then in the video options I change the fps to match source and Start with the Fast 720p preset. Xeon E5-2690 V3 (12c/24t) good for x265 encoding? I have a home server running a 4790k (4c/8t) at stock speed and it is fairly slow at encoding large 4k files. x265 uses libx265 and is software encoding done on the CPU. x265 is always better if you don't need the speed of a hardware encoder. The file sizes and encoding times of the encoded videos were: Hello, I’m wondering which encoder is better to use when recording. You can have smaller files for identical quality, but how you get there is super tricky. Tigole for impeccable video and audio x265, 5. I don't have a good enough cpu, takes some time. Which encoders in nyaa si have best quality i don't want too big and not too small. It would be better to copy the audio instead of reencoding it. Reply Pommec2 • Both SVT-AV1 and libaom can do that easily. There is always someone on these threads that has read all the specs and dismisses the releases on the merit that "It's not as good as the original" they've never downloaded the releases, because if they did, they'd know that if the encoders are good at what they do, then a 1080p H264 3GB TV show release can be encoded to x265 at between 1 and At this point since I'm rebuilding my library I just find stuff already in x265, but going from x264 to x265 isn't terrible. Even with an i9 10980XE, encoding a 2 hour 4K video takes a day at a time on CPU at the slow preset. Reply reply Encoder: H. Guys I need help here . How long it takes you to get there is the hard part. Currently, I am using h. X265 is smaller x264 by about 50%. Also, every movie benefits/needs different encoding settings. I am using handbrake and I start from the MKV 1080p x265 preset. But then you have additional profiles for supporting additional decoder capabilities like higher colour depth A new machine with hardware x265 encoding will be very quick and good quality. Also (in my opinion), the default aq-mode 2 suits low-bitrate encodes. Cleo had a few files in the past that had huge artifacts so I stayed away from them. 1 Advanced options: strong-intra-smoothing=0:rect=0:aq-mode=1 And I use H. x264: Raw Results for the x264 Encoder. My goal is to cut file sizes in about half while maintaining visually lossless quality. For low file size with acceptable great quality x265 re-encodes. 264 because the file will be smaller, you shouldn't see a difference in video quality. 265 10-bit (x265) because I prefer the CPU quality over Nvidia, CQ RF 20, Profile Main 10, level Auto, set to Medium. It seems x265 is the best codec out right now for quality and size. Because there are still no streaming services that offer 3D movies I have decided to take it into my own hands and start converting several 3D BluRays into a format I can watch in my Quest 2 with hopefully the smallest quality loss possible. If you want the best of both worlds, you'd have to losslessly record first (large file sizes, little to no compression), and re-encode later. So it really depends on purpose. x265 was kind of an oddball there, where the rational choices seem to be veryfast or slow and everything else is confused. 264 file's bitrate. 265 10-bit NVENC Constant Quality: 20 CQ Encoder Preset: Slow Encoder Profile: Main 10 Encoder Level 5. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. As far as software goes, people have already recommended you Handbrake. x264 is the older version that was introduced in 2004. Some encoders don't even call it CRF, even though they have a setting that works the same way. To be fair, the AMD encoder was still usable. 265 outperforms x. Which x265 encoder has better quality: DKB or Assuming you're using x265 as your encoder, the preset is of course the most important factor. But are you willing to suffer 2/12 fps encoding? AV1 is the future, but I just got the computing capacity to experiment with x265. This guide can also be used for x264 encoding if you so desire, I just prefer x265 for the low file sizes. I use this mainly when I have a high quality original encoded video, and want to duplicate the encode settings for it. This annoys me, especially if it's a show I want to save permanently, not so much if it's a show I watch for the sake of watching anything. i wanted to fit as many movies as possible without losing too much on the quality, so the rarbg x265 format was pretty good as a base but they weren't I'm currently using handbrake to encode remuxes to x265. If you’re not an encoding expert, it’s probably best if you just stick to x265 10bit CRF 15-20 and use the slowest preset you can tolerate. In practice I've found people get so enamoured with the smaller file sizes that they squeeze CELT/SILK encoding mode switches on-the-fly with voice activity detection (VAD) and speech/music classification using a recurrent neural network (RNN), ensuring the best best x265 movie and tv encoders? who's uploads do you guys prefer? Archived post. I’m looking for advice on what settings will give me the best picture quality while still reducing the file size significantly. Best tool to convert everything into x265? Maybe it would be even better to convert to AV1 but since all devices and servers I'm owning are having HW support for x265 I figured I'd convert everything into that for now. This is what I took from When you can take a 1080p video that is 33GB and use x265 to reduce it to 9. For x264 rargb is your guy, size and quality he the best with that codec. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. Life. I have rx6600 non xt i7 9700k 32gb ram I stream on twitch with obs however we all know amd encoder is shit but my only options here are amd, quicksync or x264 I mainly stream cod wich uses 90% of my cpu even on low settings the only way around this is the bring up my ingame res to 1440p or to make a custom res to 1440p The hardware encodes have certainly improved (although the latest gen is no better than the prior), but do not match the level of encoding efficiency or detail retention that the software encoders have. HQ 1080p preset, change the encoder to x265. 265 (x265) option) if I want a slightly smaller file Framerate: Same as source Encoder Preset: slowest (Usually hits ~300fps for 1080 and about 4x for lower resolutions) Constant quality: Depends. In custom formats, it tells me to put the names in REGEX which I don't know X265 Parameters. If you want good quality, you'll always do software encoding. Two of these disable a quality feature of the encoder, while rect=0 is actually default so it probably does nothing unless you've changed presets. If you want the best chance for a high quality video, go for HEVC FLAC but more often than not you'll get the same experience from a Setting the bitrate around the same will be a good approximation. Encoders with Animation (8bit) As far as hardware encoders go, NVENC is the best one, Intel Quicksync and AMD encoder produce lesser quality for same bitrate. You’ll basically never get a bad result doing this. You should be able to get something similar or better with QSV. I felt that tonemapping (HDR->SDR) was slightly better with x265, but not substantially so. Welcome to the Official subreddit for TP-Link, Kasa Smart, Tapo, and Deco. I use the preview With x265, I'd start with preset 'slow' or 'slower' rather than 'medium'. Judas is only carrying a few of the series I’m watching this season, so I’m looking for an alternative. Soft transfers or grainy transfers reduce HEVC efficiency significantly. . Tombdoc - Poor Man's TIgole, but if you are after Hollywood titles with Hindi audio, Tombdoc is best. Profile is a set of capabilities of a decoder. For my AMD card just H265 VCE, encoding slider set to quality and "QP" slider can be set to whatever you want. I tend to ignore them if a 4k web-dl Two different types of encoders. The current version doesn't let me utilize hardware acceleration for x265 (unless I set to 12/10 bit). Presets: Raw If it were 33,33,33 you might go x265 medium rf20. [turned on] Avg Bitrate: 12000kbps [turned off] Constant Quality: 28 (should I use this CRF?) Also, I think NVEnc Nvidia is good enough for Youtube and 1080p videos, or do I change it to CPU encoding. The D3G encode has a higher video bitrate (3974 kB/s vs 2548 kB/s). You can choose presets ranging from superfast to veryslow (there’s also placebo, but you can practically ignore it). As attend is clean archiving, NvEnc is set to "Slowest" pre-set to give it the chance of best quality output. For dual audio: neo-hevc best quality to file size ratio Iahd best quality (super high bitrate) Subbed: y'all already gave all the info on Judas. 69GB with little to no difference in visible quality, along with two large untouched audio tracks (7. The Trash guides have very detailed custom format/profile guides. One area hardware encoders always struggle is reaching peak efficiency. Here is an Article why it does so: Click. mkv instead of . You can use handbrake for this. If you mean individual parameter though, you'd probably be right in saying bframes. I’ll be viewing encoded videos on 65” OLED. The biggest quality improvements are there. = ) (It's higher by about 2 points on average. WEBRip. As they use AAC with lower bitrates. 7 Mb/s. Thanks. 265 output on resolve only gives me hardware options, not software. It seems to force YouTube to process it differently or something. 265 (HEVC) encoders with far more customization options for your specific use case. Or pretty much any decent encoder for any newer format, because no one actually uses placebo in the real world (it's called placebo for a reason). x264 is very crisp and clear, but as soon as you turn the camera in a game, it's instant pixelation unless you're at 720p or lower resolution, or a lower bitrate. 2. These CRF values are encoder-specific, so x265's CRF 18 (which is probably what the people talking about it online meant) is not the same as some other encoder's CRF 18, even if both are HEVC encoders. Looking for x265 encoding box - best CPU power/value . NVENC is actually not far off of software, though I would still use software encoding. SVT-AV1 would only look better if you’ve got >50% of idle cores using aomenc. Imho, 1337x is the best general purpose public tracker. 265 10-bit (x265) HQ 1080p30 surround for anime and should I change encoder tune or level because I don't know what to choose I just don't change them Share Add a Comment Sort by: I would say it varies by your setup and if your device can handle x265. Hi guys, I want to transcode a lot of clips, stripping unnecessary audio and re-encoding video to hevc using libx265. Encoder: H. 5 GB Overall bit rate: 21. Reddit iOS Reddit Android Reddit Premium About Reddit Advertise Blog Careers Press. 49 and 23. I then changed the video encoder to "H. Tigole - If You have a 40"+ Android TV or PC monitor, this re-encoder is the Shizz. 265 10-Bit (x265) Framerate: Constant framerate, Same as Source Quality: Constant quality, 20 RF (there's room for preference. I was looking on eBay and found some high core count Xeon chips that are quite affordable. But if you don't get live torrents, you can always DDL. I am currently looking for my fav. What I'm trying to accomplish here is to prefer x265 encodes by good groups like qxr, sev and so on but download x264 encodes if x265 encodes by those groups aren't available. X264 codec uses a lot more storage space because the encoding algorithms aren't as effecient as x265. But in all cases I compared any x265 to x264 release (not only the mini encodes) I've observed that the x265 are always more "blurry" (it's not by much). They will offer great quality. Besides Yify, i would suggest Rargb encodes at x265 1080p. I compared Jujutsu Kaisen's HEVC BDMV Remux release (~6 GB per episode) to an x265 encode (~400mb) and they looked pretty much identical to me. Erai-raws has been the go to since horriblesubs stopped So I found myself encoding these remuxes to x265, because those on RARBG were perfect for me. Happy with the settings/quality/filesize I figured out but it would take forever to encode everything I wanted to. You'll be losing info twice. HEVC(x265) is better than H. SVT-AV1-10 @ RF 20 and preset 5 (even 4) looked honestly good for the most part but still noticeably worse than my x265/RF20/Slow combination. HEVC does not have a "CRF 18". Move the encoder preset as slow as you can tolerate (try a few short test encodes to see how it goes, generally each step is half the speed). Hello guys Where can i find a good guide that shows me best x265 encode settings in Handbrake from Remux movies ? Second thingIs it possible to Oh okay cool. But I don't know how to do that in Radarr. X265 not a big difference but no platform supports X265 streaming -Best solution is good internet connection to Setting the bitrate around the same will be a good approximation. Or even SVT-AV1. mp4 , and HEVC makes encoding a 50min long video at ~2gb take ~32min on my Ryzen 5 5600. Then set --no-sao and --rskip 2 as well. I don't have the Profile is a set of capabilities of a decoder. 265 10-bit (x265), RF (not RQ) is a Constant Quality value, that indicates a quality threshold (relative to all the other settings, not absolute) where larger number is lower quality, Preset veryslow means it takes longer to process as it takes more information into account (which results in higher quality and smaller size for a given RF {for - Encoder Preset: 5 - Advanced Options: film-grain-denoise=0:film-grain=25 This will result in FAR smaller file sizes than using H265 with the Grain Encoder Preset, while looking better. Would you still prefer the vyndros encode over the D3G? Reply reply d4nm3d • personally it comes down to how it looks and not bitrate for me. Like another user suggested, the more cores you can afford, go for it. After reading dozens of threads about encoding i think I’m gonna settle down with these settings : Video codec : x265 10bit Comparing a D3G BluRay encode with a Vyndros Blu-ray encode. Under the Video tab, Video Encoder H. Using Topaz's built-in video compressor also won't give you any control over the advanced encoding or color settings for HDR content. SVT-AV1 is also one of the best encoders, which is also a really fast one too. 1 encodes in 1080p or 4k. Zero-Copy H. But if you can go for x264 movies 1080p at around 2. if you want smaller files, go to something like 22) Encoder Preset: Medium Encoder Tune: None Encoder Profile: Main 10 Encoder Level: 4. They simply can't use all the tools software encoders can. This is just my results and what works for me, but you may be more selective about your quality. 265 Framerate - Same As Source (Constant Framerate selected) RF20 Constant Quality FAST Encoder Preset Encoder Tune - None // Encoder Profile - Auto // Encoder Level - Auto Filters: All off except: Deinterlace: Decomb // Preset: Default View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Under Video: Video encoder: H. 1080p. x265-RARBG Video ID : 1 Format : HEVC I have a bunch of game videos that are taking up 2TB on a hard drive. You can set your CRF a bit higher if you want small filesizes. There isn't much more you need to do to reduce file sizes. I’m not sure if the tff flag works with x265 though. NVENC is hardware. I would probably encode without these additional options and aim for closer to A community-run subreddit for Adobe video editing apps including Premiere Pro, Premiere Rush, Premiere Elements, and Media Encoder. Not worth the hassle x265 is software encoding. Hi, I have many movies in x264 and id like to transcode them all to be x265 to save space. Felt like I found a happy place with x264 that maximized what I wanted to do with it but am having a tougher time finding my "middle ground" in x265. x265-RARBG Encoded date : UTC 2022-01-14 02:29:23 Tagged date : UTC 2022-01-14 02:29:23 Writing application : Lavf58. Does anyone know what settings they used to do those encodes. I would not use the GPU to encode x265, it's inferior and will not make the most efficient output files (larger and worse quality). RMTeam or HeTeam gives good x265 720p/1080p tv shows. The encoding preset should simply enable or disable what the encoder can do for speed vs encoding time. ALL hardware encoding is utter garbage for quality and file size, it's just fast and that's about the only benefit. I'm not looking for specific quality or a exact file size, just a decent (at least 20%) reduction. HEVC has gained quite the traction in the past few years and there are very many good releases. Slower = better, although too slow and it becomes a placebo (hence the slowest preset's name). Support, tips & tricks, discussions, and critique requests are welcome! Original video: 1280x720 59. Also, if I gotta load something to YouTube, I almost always do 10bit hevc. H265 can take an eternity if you use certain settings, but the end result for those long conversions is often the "ideal" H265 file. There is better encoders however they’re only on top tier private trackers and not on public ones. 94 fps Final dimensions: Same as source Video Encoder: H. Speaking of quality, the size/quality variation with x265 is huge. QSV uses Intel's hardware accelerated Quick Sync encoder. This advice works for either x264 or x265. Great library. The encoding triangle's corners are: encoding complexity (speed) visual quality All Encoders compared to each other All vs All. Overall, SVT-AV1 was better than all, but I didn't feel like it blew QSV AV1 out of the water. com is good all movies and TV shows are in x265 format Reply reply d4nm3d • Rmteam is rmz. Best DVD HEVC encode speed preset Have been using "medium" and crf 20 for encoding DVDs with x265. co I know you mean in quality, but consistent does not mean best. x265 is sort of a successor to 264 and it a fair bit more efficient, which allows for the same quality but at a smaller file size (or higher quality at the same size) as x264. My plugin stack for non-4K content is: Tdarr_Plugin_075a_Transcode_Customisable Tdarr_Plugin_MC93_Migz3CleanAudio Tdarr_Plugin_MC93_Migz4CleanSubs Well I'm not sure why these would be in the preset. It takes roughly 3-6 hours for a good quality encode. 0 is using GPU H265 encoding (which I think it is), the end result won't be nearly as efficient (in terms of getting better visual quality at lower bitrates) as an x265 CPU encode like you can do in Handbrake and others. CPU's (x264/x265) offer the best quality and file size, but can take the longest to do the job (as you have probably found out) A lot of these settings and what they do can easily be researched by hovering over the option. When you use slower presets, x265 tests more encoding options, using more computations to achieve the best quality at your selected bit rate (or in the case of –crf rate control, the lowest bit rate at the selected quality). 20. For this example I'll be using Scarface as it was encoded with x265 and HDR. Go to Piracy r/Piracy • by Aayush_amoli. 5-3gb size. On my Vega 64 at the same resolution, using the same bitrate (6000 kbps to twitch), the stream was more 'blocky' with compression artifacts compared to streaming using X264. Type lossless=1 in advanced options. 265. The x265 and SVT-AV1 was better in very dark scenes, but QSV was still not terrible. Personally, I err on the side The exact quality difference can vary depending on the content and encoding settings, but AV1 is typically able to deliver 20-30% better compression efficiency compared to x265. Also, beware that, if you must use x265 10-bit, using any of the filters will reduce the encoding to 8-bit. Encoding Speed: Historically, x265 has had an advantage in encoding speed compared to AV1. View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. I started doing 4k encodes recently as well and here's the profile I've adopted In a nutshell, MP4 container, resolution limit 2160p, all filters are off to preserve a 10-bit pipeline through Handbrake, H. Video Encoder: H. 1, frame rate same as source/variable, MKV I use Tdarr to re-encode and homogenize my library. Ultimate Encoding Test Results for Animation / Cartoon [x265, x264] Greetings videophiles, I have always wondered, what the best settings are in order to encode high quality animated content. zbwxf tjnap gyon gjdn effnhug dhdt zsp xjm mdhp zjqgkoev