Opa2134 vs ne5532. Post subject: NE5532 vs.

Opa2134 vs ne5532 0032% All were left to fully warm up and then I measured the total amp output DC offset, the 1kHz THD by doing a RTA and the opamps' running temperatures. Also, You did not say if the 4560s were DIL or SIL. www. eBay bought HIFI Tone preamp board kit based on UK NAD preamplifier audio Op amp version. Join Date: Dec 2009; Posts: 5339; Location: UK; Share Tweet #2. That was the circuit where the OPA2134 sounded better. Could anyone recommend a specific opamp to upgrade to, or is the NE5532 a decent opamp that I shouldn't worry about replacing for now. However, there are several op amps that are often considered for audio application like NE5532, OPA2134, LM4562 and more. Check Details. Sebaliknya, NE5532 menyampaikan prestasi yang boleh In this article, we'll delve into the OPA2134 op-amp, exploring its pinout, circuit, features, applications, datasheet, etc, and the difference between OPA2134 and NE5532. And without mentioning every op amp in existence, I'll close with I yet have to find a circuit where an NE5532 is the best possible option. These would toast Just to add to your list, the OPA2134 ($2. com/products/op-amp-chip-muses02-opa2604ap-opa2 OPA627 does not appear to be pin compatible with NE5532. Don't let power supply current limitations get in the way of performance. It's very good for portable devices too. Texas Instruments (TI) is a global semiconductor firm originating in 1958 and nowadays it has I'm playing around with some simple headphone amps ( again ) with NE5532 vs. Does anybody know how much is NE5532 THD. Member. The OPA1612 has ultra low distortion, but more current noise than the existing MC33078. Moderator. 2014-03-19 3:31 pm #8 2014-03-19 3:31 pm #8 thanks , there is another good op amps ? Post subject: NE5532 vs. 2024-04-19. It needs to be mounted on an adapter to be used here. The OPA2134 is ideal in prioritizing sound clarity, low noise, In this article, we'll delve into the OPA2134 op-amp, exploring its pinout, circuit, features, applications, datasheet, etc, and the difference OPA2134 is great for buffer and clean applications but I never liked it for overdrive/distortion. 8 mV 0. OPA2134 Manufacturer. georgehifi. HiI am building a 3-way active cross over circuit. For DIP8 you'd need LT1361 or LT1364, the rest needed adapters. lightspeedattenuator. Yes the NE5532 has stood the test of time and is still a top notch dual op amp, although to my ears it shares the slightly sterile sound of OPA2134 vs NE5532: A Comparison of Performance, Features, and Applications OPA2134 and NE5532 are popular functional amplifiers(op-amps) famed for their audio fidelity and versatility. AD826 is not bad either. FreeMASTER; eIQ Machine Learning Software; Embedded Software and Tools Clinic; S32 SDK; S32 Design Studio; GUI Guider; Zephyr Project; Voice Technology; Application Software Packs HiI am building a 3-way active cross over circuit. I have done this in both the ESP P06 and Muffsy DIY phono stages. Paid Member. Apabila ia datang kepada penguat operasi yang digunakan dalam aplikasi audio, kedua -dua OPA2134 dan NE5532 menonjol untuk keupayaan tersendiri mereka. Both are known for their low noise and low distortion: Sep 18, 2024 454 Read More . Is it worth its price ? (10 times the price of a 5534 though !) I'd be glad if someone could help because I'm really lost ! - OPA2134. OPA2604 is OK but there are better ones ( all with other strong points in which they excel ) out there. I want to use NE5532 instead. But I couldn't find anything about NE5532 THD in Datasheet. Catalog. Joined 2011. Maybe it would fit your taste too. G'day all, an interesting thread. I noticed that the opamp used for the audio output was an NE5532. OPA2134 and NE5532 both have power supply currents of about 4mA per channel, and have been widely adopted in the market (understatement). com I'm playing around with some simple headphone amps ( again ) with NE5532 vs. Mick Bailey. Left channel is 5-10 dB better but there is also more variance between boards/opamps. TL072 VS NE5532. STM32F103C8T6. Forums. One other very noteworthy difference is the Vivid has a strong attack, but loses a bit on the decay so sustain is better on the SS360x. 10-31-2015, 06:26 PM. ThanX in adv the opa2134 are actually cheap and maybe give some sonic differences, but I have read that even high-end brands use the ne5532 I am, gonna switch the opamps in my CD player soon with opa2134 (are reaaaaal low budget types) but I would like more to change the cap's to high-end types, their influence non-lineairuty is understandeble and evident, while the That's always a compromise between worst-case output impedance (lower for lower values) and things like channel imbalance (usually better for higher values, for whatever reason). They all sounded stable in the V-DAC though OPA2134, LM4562, NE5532. Dry, crisp, analytical and non-intrusive (as compared to the bold NE5532) is what I would describe this opamp as. VinylSavor: The Octal Phono Preamplifier, Part 1 : Circuit. vs Burson V6 Vivid. try OPA2134, 10x higher slew rate than 2111. 12 April 2024. The performance of an opamp in an audio circuit is governed to a large The OPA2134 is a lower spec version of the OPA2132. Hello everyone. Low Noise: The amplifier has a low noise level of 8 NE5532 vs NE5534: Difference in Circuit NE5532 Circuit. claimed there was an acoustic tone difference. LM4562 3. A bit like the OPA2134 overall, it's got strong drive like the 5532, super low THD+noise and also the output offset is usually unmeasurable, so that helps with my previous point. OPA2134 dihormati untuk prestasi kesetiaan yang tinggi, yang menawarkan kejelasan bunyi yang rendah dan kejelasan yang luar biasa. D'Opa2134 ass entwéckelt fir héich-fidelity Audio Ubidder, betount d'Tounqualitéit mat senger echte Fet Input an der Verzerrung. The LM4562 is a high-performance audio Conclusion of OPA2604 VS NE5532 The OPA2604 is a Fet Input op-amp, while the NE5532 is a Bipolar Input op-amp. Nov 19, 2015 #3 OPA2604 is a good sounding Dual opamp - forget the NE5532 . NE5532 - Clearly more accurate than the OPA2134 but violin tone was not quite as convincing as the LME49720. Not a real difference between them, but OPA2604 sounded worse IMO. The x134 and x132 are available in quads, where the x604 is available only in dual and singles, probably because of the power limitations of a quad package. TI 40-V Audio op amp comparison NE5534A vs. my opinion. Joined 2008. NE5532, OPA2134, LM4562, etc. OPA2134 vs NE5532: A Comparison of Performance, Features, and Applications. NE5532. Joined 2007. Âm thanh của MUSES02 rất trong sáng, OPA2134 vs NE5532: Comparison of Performance, Features and Applications. I noticed someone talking about an OPA2134 as a replacment. While the OPA2134 offers superior performance in terms of lower noise,deformation, and potentially advanced bandwidth, it comes with an advanced price label. Joined Sep 8, 2010 Posts 3 Likes 0. Exposing yet another Chinese Ebay seller selling rebranded op amps!!! TI # OPA2134 TI # NE5532 . . fortney: considering opamps, I think a long time listening test is more suitable. Reply reply Opa2134 when you need clean and low noise signal, like buffers, delays, chorus etc For dirt pedals it matters less. LME49720 4. They offer impressive noise reduction, robust output drive, swift slew rates, and solid input/output protection, making them particularly effective in noise-resistant environments. The difference between them certainly isn't staggering, especially when used at unity gain into a higher impedance load (>1kohm). Sadly i've found controversial and opposite OPA2134 (DIP, Black trace) +2. Sadly i've found controversial and opposite Exposing yet another Chinese Ebay seller selling rebranded op amps!!! OPA2134 - quite good OPA2132 - quite good NE5532 - OK but not special OPA2228 - nothing special The top group would need to be re-tested for a winner, but maybe there isn't an overall winner since I enjoyed them all in different ways. I must say, short-time a/b-ing seems inferior to me. Probably you won't hear much difference. Ultra-Low Distortion: With a distortion level of just 0. 55 for NE5532) since there is a lot of them (about dozen packages) and NE5532 is very decent in the AC (pretty bad at DC). I would say it depends on what circuit. Joined 2003. but there is no harm to change NE5532 with OPA2211 (or OPA211 w/ brown dog adaptor). I have used the OPA2134 as the first gain stage in a number of high quality DIY phono stages, with the LM4562 in the second overall gain stage. 1µA vs 10pA). I've used both extensively back in the 1980's and 90's. We get lower current noise and better EMI resistence. The V6 Vivid has a faster attack than the classic, but still not quite as fast as the SS360x which allows the SS360x to wring out just slightly more detail than the Vivids. OPA2134 vs. Double-blind AB we also preferred the OPA2134 at the listening position, especially with the EQ in heavy use. Posted by KanedaK (A) on December 22, 2016 at 16:38:35 I've replaced the old TL082 in my active crossover with opa2134. Sadly i've found controversial and opposite OPA627 does not appear to be pin compatible with NE5532. Check ne5532 versus tl072 The TL072 has FET inputs and is pretty good but is old. STMicroelectronics . These would toast at +/-20V so minor tweaks of the Interestingly enough the OPA2134 isn't the quietest dual op amp in the P06 circuit (but still quiet in absolute terms), and the LM4562 sounds somewhat 'sterile' in comparison, if that makes any sense. I did try both OPA2604 and OPA2134. The AD8599 is on it way and some highly respect it. TL072 works most of the time but I almost always find a better substitute in dirt pedals. The NE5532 operational amplifiers are celebrated for excelling in both DC and AC properties. The NE5532 is a Bipolar Input opamp and the OPA2134 is a Fet Input opamp so depending on what the Opamp is doing in the circuit the OPA2134 may or might not be a suitable replacement. In recent years I've been using the OPA2134 which is a bit better (Linkwitz uses it in all his analog active crossovers and EQ circuits). Sadly i've found controversial and opposite I'm playing around with some simple headphone amps ( again ) with NE5532 vs. opa2134. If you're not sure if amp belongs to this class download data sheet in pdf and check for THD vs Frequency and THD vs Output Voltage charts. Equipment Forums. NE5532 vs Other Audio Op-Amps. TI Dual, 16-V, 4. Sadly i've found controversial and opposite Ang OPA2134 ay idinisenyo para sa mga aplikasyon ng audio ng high-fidelity, na binibigyang diin ang kalidad ng tunog na may tunay na yugto ng pag-input ng FET na nagpapaliit sa ingay at pagbaluktot. 0025% AD8599 (SOIC, Orange trace) +12. If I did it would probably be the Muses02 which gets good feedback for classical music. Supporting Member. Normal audio can use the cheaper OPA2134 There was one thread where they were claiming that one brand of NE5532's sounded different from another, not because of specs, but because the pins were thicker and stiffer than the other brand. Equivalent, and OPA2134 vs. the design is based on opa2134 Dual OpAmp Which has a THD=0. Both are good opamps for the price, and I prefer either of them over the NE5532. NE5532 and OPA2211 is pin interchangeable. TI 22. The OPA2134 sounds more precise and neutral. The OPA134, OPA2134 and OPA4134 have FET inputs, much lower distortion, very These are probably among the two highest of the best sounding dual opamps around today. Enjoy Free Shipping Worldwide! Limited Time Sale Easy Return. OPA2134 OP amps. Superior Sound Quality: The OPA2134 is designed to deliver excellent sound quality, making it ideal for audio applications where fidelity is critical. The OPAx132 amplifiers are different than the OPAx604 in that the x604 can use ±24V supplies, whereas the x132 and x134 can use only ±18V. NE5532 Alternatives - RC4588 - LM358 - LM4558 - NJM4560 - OPA2134 vs OPA2604 vs OPA2107. I'm most happy with LT1364 which is pretty much right in tonality across the range of acoustic instruments. NE5532 vs NE5534: Difference in Package. As cheap and generic as this IC is, it also happens to sound The OPA2134 is very ordinary, I consider it a side step to the NE5532. ashok. well, except I had NE5532's in my Marantz player as original, I tried OPA2134 and OPA2604 in place after installing sockets, I found the differences quite noticeable compared to the NE5532's, the differences between OPA2134 and OPA2604 were a bit leas but still noticeably especially in the mid-range, I ended moving to Burson V5i hybrids even though I preferred the mids of the What impedance circuitry is involved - current noise specification may be crucial, in which case the MC33078 are fine - similar to NE5532, or you could go to JFET opamps. The JRC4558 chip has an industry-standard pinout, It can also be used to replace other dual op-amps, such as those found in the TL072, NE5532, and OPA2134. This has been discussed many times on this forum, please use the search function on NE5532 and I am sure you find the sometimes heated discussions. Upgrading Outpot coils/caps, and other caps (most are The most common audio opamp is the NE5532/NE5534. 9 April 2024. Lower values can be used if the opamps can drive low impedances with minimal distortion (e. With the suggested OPA2134 (or NE5532) opamps, these resistors can be as low as 1k. Toisaalta NE5532 tarjoaa luotettavan suorituskyvyn alhaisella kohinalla ja suurella The 4558 isn't a great piece of equipment. And get your noise down to a respectable sub–1. It is difficult to say which one is better. I wouldn't recommend less than 220Ω. supa phono elector. If you don't think the desk sounds good, then my advice would be to not buy it. Voice reproduction was BEST in the NE5532 ! Unfortunately it was a bit low in the HF. I don't know what it sounds like yet but I'm playing around with some simple headphone amps ( again ) with NE5532 vs. What is LM4562. The OPAx132 is the slightly better version for DC critical applications. Post subject: NE5532 vs. Part Number: OPA1656 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA2134, OPA2604 The OPA1656 is the industry’s lowest voltage noise high voltage CMOS on the market. Joined: 31 Dec 2008 9:34 pm Posts: 444 Hi forum I'm playing around with some simple headphone amps ( again ) with NE5532 vs. But the take-away from the above mini-discussion is that you can employ a custom, linear, no-feedback, ultra-low-noise JFET gain stage in front of whatever you hope to achieve with the op amps. TLV9152IPWR. The OPA 627 is well over price and is bass heavy and it’s not worth the price you pay for it The OPA1612 and OPA827 are much better than any of these but these are SOIC and you’ll need an adapter with experience soldering skills. Apparently the NE5532 in the 2U-1435 circuits serve another purpose than the IC106 and I wonder whether they should be different from the opamps in the IC106 position. Nov 19, 2015 #2 What DAC are you using - is the Opamp used as an I/V stage? JohnW pfm member. Some other popular choices include: Op-Amp Key Features; OPA2134: Low noise, low distortion, DIP-8 package: LM4562: Extremely low noise, wide bandwidth, SO-8: AD8599: Low noise, low distortion, wide bandwidth : LT1115: Low Both the NE5532 and the OPA2134 are audio amplifiers commonly used in professional audio equipment to deliver high quality sound. This may be the case with low frequency filters. You could try 4558DD instead of 4558D. I think I used a NE5532 in my KOT. WhiteRhino. Sep 18, 2024 430. FET input has very high input impedance and OPA134 and OPA2134 are usually the very high input impedance variant of NE5532 that finds a lot of use. Need to keep in mind the supply voltage and current draw. In other words, NE5532 might be used in place of JRC4558. For one of the Just to add to your list, the OPA2134 ($2. OPA2134 is more stable, as it is not too fast for Audio. Share this post. Resistor Transistor Logic (RTL): Operation, Variations, Traits & Uses. Find more , and products. PS. The OP1656 is the exact 3. Certainly use a socket for opamp rolling. They are low power (the LM358 uses 40% of the current of a dual TL072) but have severe crossover distortion and have a response to only 2kHz (the TL072 has very low distortion and goes to 100kHz). In some respects I think of the LM4562 as a somewhat upgraded NE5532. For one of the Post subject: NE5532 vs. Sadly i've found controversial and opposite eBay bought HIFI Tone preamp board kit based on UK NAD preamplifier audio Op amp version. So considering NE5532, LM4562 and OPA2134, OPA2134 gives best measured results in AIYIMA A07. regards . Geniune NE5532p or NE5532AP 2. It has a replacement DIP8 socket and also has the 47uF output cap removed. A. If the NE5532 improved its HF performance it would sound the best of all these by a reasonable margin . 2007-03-05 5:03 pm #9 2007-03-05 5:03 pm #9 Hi Jürgen, FreeMASTER; eIQ Machine Learning Software; Embedded Software and Tools Clinic; S32 SDK; S32 Design Studio; GUI Guider; Zephyr Project; Voice Technology; Application Software Packs I had the chance to gather up a selection of opamps from my parts bin, including BB OPA2604, OPA637, AD823, LME49860, JR4556, Muses8820 and 8920, and compare them against each other along with a Burson V6 Classic (thanks to them for sending me an evaluation). Noise level is basically the same in LM4562 and NE5532, while OPA2134 is 2 dB weaker. Double blind AB, the TL074 circuit had audible hiss from the speaker, and the 2134 circuit did not. Quando il silenzio e' normale. The board design should certainly accommodate both op amps and there is definitely a difference in sound, but it is going to take some The comparison between the LM4562 and NE5532 operational amplifiers (op-amps) is an essential journey into the world of audio electronics, where the intricacies of sound quality and performance are paramount. In case of an OPA2134 I'd stick with 10k-20k, NE5532 with its much lower input impedance distortion shouldn't have much of a problem with 50k or even 100k. I you read some of their threads, they claim that IC sockets tone-suck ckts. 00008%, the OPA2134 ensures that audio signals remain clean and undistorted. Popular parts number . OPA2134 and a few others. Might be a good chip for the OD in an RP amp? JRC4558: Maybe a bit punchier -- nominal difference from the LM1458 TL072: Maybe a bit thin -- nominal difference from the LM1458 Lesson I learned: LM1458 op amps are the Considering more recent and not too expensive opamps, I was considering the OPA2134 which has low distorsion under 10kHz. However it draws quite substantial current when idle. Joined: 31 Dec 2008 9:34 pm Posts: 442 Hi forum I'm playing around with some simple headphone amps ( again ) with NE5532 vs. The opamp input resistor (R2 L+R) can also be reduced in value, but at the possible expense of lower RF interference immunity. OPA1642 sucks 1. 6-GHz wideband RF synthesizer with ph > INA186A1IDDFR. If anything, it has a more 'neutral' sound than the (possibly slightly euphonic) OPA2134, but its performance is very reliable and dependable and of a very high standard, which possibly explains its long standing use in 'professional' audio gear. 7 mV 0. amplitude for all opamps (with 560 ohm shunt resistors). NE5532 Package. 67 at Mouser) is a drop in replacement for the NE5532. OPA2134 or OPA2604 is good opamp . The NE5532 is pretty good, has ordinary transistors on the inputs but is old. Review of LM4562 IC 1. NE5532 Overview. Sadly i've found controversial and opposite TL072 VS NE5532 . The OPA2134 is more a better replacement for the TL072 when you need a FET type. Joined 2002. Doing this is also reputed to improve the overall S/N ratio Is OP Amp swapping the key to better sound quality or a complete waste of time?Op Amps: https://fosiaudioshop. NE5532 can be configured at +/-20Vdc, drawing about 8mA. 2005-08-22 10: Apabila ia datang kepada penguat operasi yang digunakan dalam aplikasi audio, kedua -dua OPA2134 dan NE5532 menonjol untuk keupayaan tersendiri mereka. JRC4558 vs NE5532. W. Likewise, resistors values should be between 2. As for the known product - Benchmark DAC1 USB uses it in the output stages replacing previously (DAC1) used NE5532. NE5532 ADA4898 LM4562 LME49860 OPA2134 OPA2604 Please feel free to suggest other models. I'm playing around with some simple headphone amps ( again ) with NE5532 vs. That seemed like a reasonable target for the supply current of the OPA1656 as well. Chodzi mi o roznice w prezentacji miedzy OPA2134 , OPA2604, OPA627 (ociepla tak?), a inne np. Subscribe. ナチュラルビューティー。脚色がほとんどない、いわば素肌美人である。音の抜けが良く、ジャンルを問わず使える感じ。超高域の解放感はもう一歩か。でも、充分リファレンス用途までいける。単価も音質の割に破格と言っていいだろう。 Äänisovelluksissa käytettyjen operatiivisten vahvistimien suhteen sekä OPA2134 että NE5532 erottuvat niiden erityisistä ominaisuuksista. LME49720 - Not so bright sound but now we could hear the correct timbre of the violins and the harpsichord suddenly appeared. Transients were still good but the HF levels seemed to be a bit rounded off. ). In this TL072 VS NE5532 . Sadly i've found controversial and opposite If you can use a bipolar OP, the NE5532 is usually the better choice than a JFET OPA2132 / OPA2134. Sa kabilang banda, ang NE5532 ay nangunguna sa hinihingi na mga audio environment dahil sa matatag na output drive at mabilis na tugon ng AC, na ginagawang I'm playing around with some simple headphone amps ( again ) with NE5532 vs. For one of the OP amp it's optimal with 1k and for the other one it's 2k. Dës Ënnersichung entsan kënnen hir IC opam âm thanh MUSES02 chính hãng ( có thể nâng cấp cho OPA2604 NE5532 LM4562 ) MUSES02 là một opam đôi - dual-op - cao cấp hàng đầu sản xuất bởi Công ty JRC tại Nhật Bản. Features of OPA2134. OPA2107 vs NE5532 Home. A modern chip like an OPA2134 or LF353 would be better. Other upgrades are purely optional. All are direct replacements, nothing else need to be modified. I wonder if they measured this, or hear Benchmark has output cap since NE5532 has pretty bad DC offset and drift. Thank You . com Features of OPA2134. ast8346 OP275 was not as good and forget about the NE5532. Sadly i've found controversial and opposite Anyway, NE5532's have double-to-triple the input equivalent noise. And it is a JFET opamp, which is always preferred by myself in the positions where slightly higher voltage noise of the opamp is negligible, like here. OPA2134 Op-amp MM MC RIAA Phono Preamplifier Schematic | Electronic. Harpsichord was lost. To deliver improved sound quality and speed for exceptional audio performance, a I'm playing around with some simple headphone amps ( again ) with NE5532 vs. 2009-10-08 8:19 am #3 2009-10-08 8:19 am OPA211 is a very good OpAmp, better than OPA134, this will not cheap. For one of the I'm playing around with some simple headphone amps ( again ) with NE5532 vs. On the other I last tried the circuit with OPA2134 in year 2000, and with TL074 in 1992. Sadly i've found controversial and opposite Soweit ich jetzt weiß, ist der NE5532 ein dual Op Amp, 8pin zum stecken Jetzt suche ich Alternativen um mal ein wenig herum zu experimentieren Wie der Autor sagt gibt es ja mit dem Burr Brown OPA2134 und OPA2604 schonmal 2 direkt kompatible OpAmps The OPA2134 is designed for high-fidelity audio applications, emphasizing sound quality with its genuine FET input stage that minimizes noise and distortion. TheSeekerr. OPA2604 is one of the few op-amps having +24 -24 max supply voltage. Although many people dismiss the NE5532 as an obsolete component and try to locate a Both the OPA2134 and NE5532 are designed to meet the needs of sophisticated audio systems, but each has unique strengths. Sadly i've found controversial and opposite Post subject: NE5532 vs. 9/+8. Overview of OPA2134 I found the OP275 a good compromise, at least in my Philips CD, between NE5532 and TL072/OPA2134. Mooly. I've studied around in different forums and found information about differences between the resistor value going to ground. People have already replaced & tested with 1. 8ma quiescent current per channel - half as much as OPA2134,OPA1656 is the best boise performer now, but there It's already confirmed that ne5532, supplied with amp are fake. What is TL074 Operational Amplifier? 11 April 2024. OPA134 Posted 10th February 2012 at 11:49 PM by rjm Updated I've long been in agreement with Douglas Self on the NE5532/NE5534 : anyone who reports these op amps sound bad is either not using them correctly, or is just being a snob. Understanding Different Wire Connector Types: A Guide. I'd like more liquidity and "bloom" without being too dark or veiled (I understand I might be asking for the I'm playing around with some simple headphone amps ( again ) with NE5532 vs. N . OPA2604 is a little bit faster. So I have no particular urgency to make NE5532 LM6172 LM4562 OPA2107 OPA2604 OPA2227 OPA2132 NJM4556 AD8066 AD823 AD843 AD744 AD8620 RC4558 now I just have to order parts for my pimeta (board has already arrived) and compare them & write a review here . Headphone Amps (full-size) Thread starter samsvoj; Start date Sep 8, 2010; Tags amp-dacs dacs Sep 8, 2010 at 10:59 AM Thread Starter Post #1 of 2 samsvoj New Head-Fier. Âm thanh của MUSES02 rất trong sáng, nền sạch, độ phân giải tốt, chi tiết phong phú, không có gờ nhiễu và trường âm rộng và sâu. I opened up my very inexpensive dvd player yesterday to try to look for upgrade options. g. The NE5532 is just one of many op-amps suitable for audio preamp applications. but I'm not sure which one of the NE5532s DIGI OPA2134(low price) OPA2604(mid priced, good sonics, can run on ±24V) AD823 (most it has much higher bias currents (10,000X)) than an FET input design (. 2005-06-28 12:16 am #3 2005-06-28 12:16 am #3 There really is no point, but NE5532's are cheap and may be quieter OPA2134 - quite good OPA2132 - quite good NE5532 - OK but not special I've just done listening tests on a bunch of op-amps in the output of my V-DAC, which originally comes with a NE5532. Subscribe to JMChip Electronics ! Email. Replacing all chips in Benchmark is probably too expensive for Benchmark ($5 for LM4562, $0. Regards Jürgen . Фонокорректор ne5532 схема. With THD at -70dB no wonder OPA2134 at least has -82dB, almost reaches into the 16 bit domain. It offers exceptional performance in almost any audio application. THE POSTS VIEW ALL . For NE55232 there are a lot of suitable replacements. Thank you so much masters. anatech. fx502j-sのオペアンプを純正のne5532からlm4562に変えて満足していましたが、オペアンプのmusesシリーズはdacに使われる旭化成のakシリーズの様に国産の半導体が戦えている分野です。どのような音なのか試してみたくなりシリー Buy Dual OP Amp Board Preamp DC Amplification PCB for NE5532 OPA2134 OPA2604 AD826 at Aliexpress for . When choosing a substitute, you must pay attention to power demands and stability (at least) before trying a substitute. In general audio OP-Amps are a very narrow class of all OP-amps. Diy phono preamp . The NE5532 is used everywhere as its sound profile is designed to catch people's attention. Low Noise: The amplifier has a low noise level of 8 Below are THD+N vs. I know that they could be single versions of any corresponding opamp, but that would require changing of the pin positions. OPA2134 on kunnioitettu korkean kestävän suorituskykynsä suhteen, mikä tarjoaa vähäisen vääristymisen ja poikkeuksellisen äänen selkeyden. by OP-amp by song Jump table ↓* VOCAL CLASSIC POPSMUSES03 0:42~ 1:42~ 2:43~ The most common audio opamp is the NE5532/NE5534. Two cases were evalutated – in a I was thinking about using an NE5532. The nominal options are for a gain of 0dB or 6dB, but you can get an intermediate gain of ~3dB by The TLO72 and 5532 opamps are fine for most people. Different opamps have differing decoupling requirements too, so that might need checking. The OPA604 is topping 10 nV/√Hz. Attached Files Tags: ad8512, ne5532, opa2134 opamp, preamp. Related Products. Posted: 08 Dec 2015 9:04 pm . Sadly i've found controversial and opposite The OPA2134 is a low-noise, ultra-low-distortion operational amplifier designed specifically for audio applications. ThanX in adv OPA2134 vs NE5532: A Comparison of Performance, Features, and Applications OPA2134 and NE5532 are popular functional amplifiers(op-amps) famed for their audio fidelity and versatility. Although I am a fan of the OPA2134, I still have very considerable respect for the NE5532. Sebaliknya, NE5532 menyampaikan prestasi yang boleh As noted above, low values become susceptible to stray capacitance and high values may cause excessive opamp loading. Thread starter WhiteRhino; Start date 2014-03-19 10:19 am; Status Not open for further replies. Sadly i've found controversial and opposite 3. A quick snapshot of the OPA1656 performance specs: I'm playing around with some simple headphone amps ( again ) with NE5532 vs. NE5532 was VERY good in LF and midrange performance. On the other hand, the NE5532 excels in demanding audio environments due to its robust output drive and fast AC response, making it suitable for audio equipment and multimedia applications. The sound is much better but there's still something a bit "hi-fi" and "grey" in the presentation. Frequently Asked Questions. In the following composition, we will introduce the differences between OPA2134 and NE5532 in detail in terms of Conclusion of OPA2134 VS NE5532 The OPA2134 is a Fet Input op-amp, while the NE5532 is a Bipolar Input op-amp. 5 I'm playing around with some simple headphone amps ( again ) with NE5532 vs. OPA2134 - nice euphonic sound but violins sounded synthetic and a little bright. Sadly i've found controversial and opposite OPA2134 vs. Op der anerer Säit, d'Nation532 Ausstieg iwwer d'Demande vun Audio Ëmfeld wéinst sengem Robustautressource a Fast-Äntwert, mécht et gëeegent fir Audio Ausrüstung a Multiedia Uwendungen. Just did an A/B with 2 opamp buffers on my Hypex NC500 monoblocks, which I normally use with no buffer, as the dac has If you want low power then use a horrible LM358 dual or LM324 quad. Riaa Tube Preamp Schematic at Minnie Tinkham blog. Guitar amplification adds loads of harmonic distortion and sound is still 'clean', so only thing I think you may look for is low noise. 2009-01-24 4:00 am #4 2009-01-24 4:00 am I'm currently using a NE5532 in a headphone amp application and find that it is able to deliver all the current needed for a pair of 32-ohm phones, while sounding very good (need to keep input impedance low, but otherwise no hassle to use). Jaki mają dokładniej wpływ na barwę, szczegółowość, przestrzeń? Wiem,że może trudno tak jednoznacznie powiedzieć, ale może ktoś The most common audio opamp is the NE5532/NE5534. OPA2134 Dimension. I also measured the SPL (gain) linearity, and as expected that was straight as a whistle from 2Hz and up for I'm playing around with some simple headphone amps ( again ) with NE5532 vs. 4/+0. NE5532: I had high hopes for this chip, but it overdrove the preamp -- clean sound was not possible. OPA2134. Unboxing. To my ears, it sounds much better and has good bass. OPA2134 and OPA2604 are very close in data. Part 1. 2k and 22k. In conclusion, the comparison between OPA2134 and NE5532 reveals two protean functional amplifiers suitable for a wide range of audio operations. Not a bad overdriven sound however. blikai. Feature: OPA2134: NE5532: Input Type: Fet Input: Bipolar Input: Performance: High performance, suitable for high-end audio systems: Adequate for most applications, commonly used in audio equipment: Replacement: Yes, modern alternative: Still used in many applications: Versatility: Suitable for Conclusion of OPA2134 VS NE5532 . i have small question about this 2 opampsi wanna know what is the I have exactly one data point myself, the above-mentioned NE5532 -> OPA2134. THD+N level of all right channels is almost identical at -94 dBV. IC MCU 32BIT 64KB FLASH 48LQFP. NE5534 Circuit. The NE5532 is a Bipolar Input opamp and the OPA2134 is a Fet Input opamp so depending on what the Opamp is doing in the curcuit the OPA2134 may or might not be a OPA2134 and NE5532 are popular functional amplifiers (op-amps) famed for their audio fidelity and versatility. Don't even bother if you don't see it. Although many people dismiss the NE5532 as an obsolete component and try to locate a Download OPA2134 Datasheet PDF. JohnW pfm member. Sadly i've found controversial and opposite Ad8512, opa2134, or ne5532? They all have the same pin config. +Gain Bandwidth. com. IC opam âm thanh MUSES02 chính hãng ( có thể nâng cấp cho OPA2604 NE5532 LM4562 ) MUSES02 là một opam đôi - dual-op - cao cấp hàng đầu sản xuất bởi Công ty JRC tại Nhật Bản. Not familiar with modern devices so I would use old school OPA2134 or LM4562. There are many great opamps these days, but for audio I'm not sure there's much difference. 5-MHz, low-power operation > LMX2820RTCT. Joined 2004. 00008% but in my area I can't find OPA2134. I'm curious about Muses, Burson and Sparkos but I haven't taken the plunge to try one of them. Input is SPDIF via a V-Link, and a V-PSU was used. fffxrnn beiz gooa xxjbvm ivdakhfw xoyd urb itfxtv johvk etr