IdeaBeam

Samsung Galaxy M02s 64GB

Sony a7iii image quality reddit. Some thoughts: Identical sensor.


Sony a7iii image quality reddit But I wouldn’t pay that price for it since the shutter count is a bit much. Sony a7iii image noise . I shoot video on an A7Siii and A7iii. I think I would choose Nikon z6ii. For just on the go (daily things like It sounds like its a good quality and really fun lens that can do most things very well. Great image quality and pleasing bokeh There is something truly special and unique about the photos the a7siii captures. Issues with A6600 video image quality. 4 vs 24. I am sort of intermediate shooter, dont really take the worst pics but not the best too. 4 or the $499 7Artisans 35mm T1. . Nasty skin tones are especially problematic. That is the hard truth. I’d 100% buy the newer camera Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony Alpha brand and related gear: Sony E Mount, Sony A Mount, legacy Minolta cameras, RX cameras, lenses, flashes, photoshare, and discussion. The A7iii is pretty cheap on the used market, so if you need to shoot video and have a tight budget, that's the camera I would recommend. At $1800 price point, I’d say get the Fuji XT-4 or XH-2. I use the A7iii for full frame pictures and the a6700 when I want to take photos with a crop I shoot with Sony a7III (bought less than a year ago to replace my Sony a6000) The two lenses used here are the Sony 2. Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony Alpha brand and related gear: Sony E Mount, Sony A Mount, legacy Minolta cameras, RX cameras, lenses, flashes, photoshare, and discussion. 8 bit aside, I just find the colours from the Sony disgusting. Please abide by the rules of our community. If you are a video maker. Bigger lenses feel a lot more at home on the iii. It's a question of course which compromise you are willing to take Smaller file size and 2fps Priorities are compact size, still image quality, frame rate, durability/water resistance, and ease of use (its winter half the year here). Hey guys, So i've been a sony shotter since 2018 and Haven't replaced my camera since (sony a73) both cameras this week on a tripod and use the same lens and shoot on the same subject and then will compare the image quality. Currently had a A7III for about 4 years with a stable of lenses (16-35GM, 24-105, 90 macro, 100-400GM, 1. IQ is great in low light and the Image quality is spectacular if you're doing only photo. A7iii is a great camera that still holds standards of image quality even on 2024. For me, it would be video, as the A9 (or the A9 II) doesn't have picture profiles. 1080 at 120 fps is also really nice on the A7iii and the higher resolution means it's really a photo and video hybrid. At the end of the day, Image Quality should be the most important thing a camera can do. The 24-70 GM is great btw. From what I gathered when I was choosing which camera to buy, I found that the real advantage of the Sony A7R III was its higher resolution (42. on the sony a6xxx system you can get an INSANE zoom range with very nice image quality with a 18 Thanks for the reply. The 6700 has way better features and quality of life than A7iii. 5-5. I use a Sony A7iii and it’s very easy to use and intuitive. At least if you're sold on 1 of those 2 that'd be my say. I bought Sony A7IV. Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! (I love my 10-20 f/4), but it isn’t nearly as versatile. 8 is actually very good (50 is mediocre though). Af is good on the Sony Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony Alpha brand and related gear: Sony E Mount, Sony A Mount, legacy Minolta cameras, RX cameras, lenses, flashes, photoshare, and discussion. Never encountered any issues on a little over 50,000 full frame photos shot on Sony so far. Here are a few things I’ve considered and The A6400 would make an excellent backup camera should you go A7III. sorry im am fairly new and not used to reddit but i dont really have anyone else to ask this question. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now and some highlight pullbacks or tweaking white balance. Welcome to reddit's home for discussion of the Canon EF, EF-S, EF-M, and RF Mount interchangeable lens DSLR and Mirrorless cameras, and occasionally their point-and-shoot cousins. Go Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony Alpha brand and related gear: Sony E Mount, Sony A Mount, legacy Minolta cameras, RX cameras, lenses, flashes, photoshare, and discussion. Difference in Sony A7 models there's an image quality boost with the A7 III from the A7 II in the low light department since it runs a new processor and When I went G85 to a7iii, it was because I could get the Tamron 17-28, 28-75 and 70-180 f2. Besides that, the people I work with recommended me to buy a a7iii when I want to also start shooting, cause Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony Alpha brand and related gear: Sony E Mount, Sony A Mount, legacy Minolta cameras, RX cameras, lenses, flashes, photoshare, and discussion. I sometimes crop even further (down to 6-7mpx), and really, on social media it is irrelevant as long as the perceived clarity and sharpness of the image is fine – which is usually the case with images >4-8mpx esp. The quality of the images are really good, however, after uploading them to Instagram, the quality really reduces. I'm also going to upgrade my lens to the samyang 35-150 f2-2. The Canon eos 7D. Reddit's most popular camera brand Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony Alpha brand and related gear: Sony E Mount, Sony A Mount, legacy Minolta cameras, RX cameras, lenses, flashes, photoshare, and discussion. I dont do much or any video so i How to choose between file format on image quality settings? Help! Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony Alpha brand and related gear: Sony E Mount, Sony A Mount, legacy Minolta cameras, RX cameras, lenses, flashes, photoshare, and discussion. 6 kit lens. Reply reply LTB_fanclub Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony Alpha brand and related gear: Sony E Mount, Sony A Mount, legacy Minolta cameras, RX cameras, lenses, flashes, photoshare, and discussion. 8 for decent portraits and candids. 2). The photo i post is edited, This compression creates poor video quality. since cameras such as the A7C have pretty high The Sony A7iii retails for US$2,000 (or AUD$3,000 in Australia). I am using Auto ISO setting. Which is alone really great With its 10-bit codec and 4K 60p/50p recording, this camera will give you a deeper color palette and higher slow motion frame rates than the Sony. I'd go the Sony A7III as you'd probably benefit more from the speedy AF and larger lens ecosystem. If you need photo and professional quality video (and if you want to save some money), you might want to consider the $1,299 Super 35/APS-C Fuji X-S20 plus Fuji versions of either the $269 Viltrox 33mm f/1. The short answer is the A7iii is an incredible piece of engineering, the image quality is outstanding and the feature set is simply unmatched 6 months after the release of the camera. It is sharper at equivelent apertures across the whole frame, has much better coatings for flare resistance and, chromatic abberation. Sony cameras are not know for having much soul or personality but this camera has one at least in still mode. Here are a few examples of the 4K 50p/60p slow motion image quality this camera can produce: Nikon z6 ii has better color science from what I watched. Rather than getting the expensive A7siii to use as a hybrid camera, get the brand new FX30 as a dedicated video camera and an A7iii/A7C as a dedicated photo camera. If you want a camera that will carry you further in terms of years, the a7iii might be a good option! Hope this helps! If you want a bit more reach you can opt for the Sony 24-105mm F4 and if you're after maximum image quality you should consider stepping to the Sigma 24-70mm F2. 8 , the Sony 40mm f/2. [Referrals] The X-S20 is a great still camera, as seen in I use fairly cheap (AU$20-$30 or so) Hoya UX UV filters on my lens (Sigma 24-70mm f/2. If you are doing photos, the viewfinder is pretty important. the image quality is significantly worse than the R series and the video is ehh there are some things it doesn’t do esp in 4K - but the clunkiness and overheating makes it I downloaded DpReview's studio shots to compare A7iii and A7RIV in terms of final photo quality considering the worse noise but higher mp count of the A7RIV Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony Alpha brand and related gear: Sony E Mount, Sony A Mount, legacy Minolta Hello there i recently got my Sony a7III I have been playing around with the upload quality on Instagram and i have come to realize that it is not as sharp as I expectes to be when i upload on social, i checked some other accounts sony users And the A7iv seemed to me to capture more of that crispiness when uploaded on Instagram. The A7iii would also be better in low light compared the A7Riii. All of the Sony a6xxx cameras are also 24mp units that produce 6000x4000 photos, Outright image quality potential will be full frame and the 85mm 1. Em i doing something wrong and how can i improve. A beginner won't see much difference in terms of picture quality between full frame and APSC. I bought it for company and product photography. so the main initial factor for me was overall price - Sony and compatible lenses just can’t be beat price wise when compared to Canon and Nikon and Tamron makes 550K subscribers in the AskPhotography community. Of course also the colors and the awful oversharpening of the iPhone. Best telephoto lenses for Sony a7iii at the lowest price? comments. So if image quality is top priority, go full frame and try and stretch to a7iii for the much improved AF and battery life. However, lately, my photos just don’t seem to measure up to that set. (A7iii) Help! Hi all, have been seriously struggling to get clear photos with my a7iii for some Got my first camera at the start of the weekend. Photo submissions must include the camera and lens used to take the shot. i love the build quality and all but i expected to have better photo quality. Reply reply Welcome to reddit's home for discussion of the Canon EF, EF-S, EF Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony Alpha brand and related gear: Sony E Mount, Sony A Mount, legacy Minolta cameras, RX cameras, lenses, flashes, photoshare, and discussion. I'm also a a7s III user and I don't use it anymore, just when I need 120p 4k, 240p HD or extreme low light work. I’m still using an a7iii, and use a pocket6k for video. Unofficial Fujifilm subreddit for Fuji photographers to share photos, ask questions, discuss digital photography, cameras and lenses, and share gear news and rumors. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. A73 will definitely work for what you are looking for. Reply reply ido-scharf Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony Alpha brand and Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony Alpha brand and related gear: Sony E Mount, Sony A Mount, legacy Minolta cameras, RX cameras, lenses, flashes, photoshare, and discussion. As someone who switched from Canon to Sony (a7III) about 3 years ago, I have zero regrets. The two card slots, battery life, and swivel screen, all seem to address the faults of Sony's older models. If you only shoot photo I wouldn’t hesitate to recommend the A7III, the image quality is Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony Alpha brand and related gear: Sony E Mount, Sony A Mount, legacy Minolta cameras, RX cameras, lenses, flashes, photoshare, and discussion. 8 Art. I am getting very grainy photos mostly when using manual mode rather than the A or S setting. Also why canon and Nikon completely dumped dslr technology It is dating now. Really dislike the ergonomics, menu system, and lack of Sony's E-mount zooms are generally of a poorer image quality than Canon's L series and adapted 300mm+ primes (which you have to do because there are no E-mount variants) are going to be slower to focus. Its shortcomings are more on the speed and AF side, the interface, and ergonomics. I got a kit Canon 18-55mm lens. and same with the 24mm f2 sigma and 65mm sigma all of those lenses are CRIMINALLY underrated you If it’s the two cameras only. If your images don't look stellar with the A7III, they won't look good with the A7IV either. I'm mostly using it for making video and occasionally shooting photos. The image you get in photos is likewise incredible. Video is great, and photos are also perfect (assuming you have good glass). That however does not mean that the A7 iii Thanks for the feedback, u/upseti3000 - I understand. Anything else, and the A7II and A7III perform pretty comparably. I call it the little sister to the A7III. -Objectively better photo quality, due to no AA filter and better colours -Pixel shift mode A7III pros: -Better autofocus -Slightly better low light -Smaller files, easier to work with -I'm no video guy, but the A7III has some video features that the A7R lacks In my opinion, the only reasons to choose the A7III over A7RIII are: Image quality doesn’t have a huge amount to do with the camera body, more the lens you use. The fact that the Z7 and EosR cannot match it from a features and functionality perspective 6 Hi All Facing the classic upgrade dilemma that I’m sure a lot of people are facing right now. Whether you're a seasoned professional or just starting out, this subreddit is the perfect place to 16-bit ProRes RAW Recording: The FX-3 supports 16-bit ProRes RAW recording, providing an unprecedented level of colour depth and flexibility in post-production. and should outperform the a6500 on pretty much every image quality metric. Despite using the same camera and lens, the quality feels off. The A7C also has improved autofocus while in video. Sony has come a long way wit their color codec. Reply reply Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony Alpha brand and related gear: Sony E Mount, Sony A Mount, legacy Minolta cameras, RX cameras, lenses, flashes, photoshare, and discussion. A7iii if you are doing photos. Choose the a6500 if The A7III is still a very capable camera. Totally still relevant and advanced as a photo camera. (lighter version of a7iii) and tamron 20-40mm f2. Got my first camera at the start of the weekend. But in weddings, events or my everday life I Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony Alpha brand and related gear: Sony E Mount, Sony A Mount, legacy Minolta cameras, RX cameras, lenses, flashes, photoshare, and discussion. Reply reply Sony a7iii is there right on the top. Video leaves a lot to be desired with dynamic range, fps at 4k, and 8 bit. 5 the FE 50mm f/2. You would have bought an expensive lens and get sub optimal image quality. Focusing is easy and intuitive with both manual and AF lenses. I saw a couple of videos in which the screen HI. Lenses for the a7iii (and full frame cameras in general) can be significantly more expensive than lenses for cameras like the a6400. Also, before you take the plunge, look into lenses as well. If you can swing a74, should be future proof for quite some time. I Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony Alpha brand and related gear: Sony E Mount, Sony A Mount, legacy Minolta cameras, RX cameras, lenses, flashes, photoshare, and discussion. Updated AF, but very similar image quality in a smaller body. Does Perfect for weddings that I mainly shoot. I just did the same upgrade a few weeks ago and I'm happy with the decision. I am a new owner of Sony a7 III with Sony FE 28-70mm f/3. hey guys! I am looking to get a Sony camera. And with the new flippable screen. IQ is great in low light and the resolution is plenty for my needs. I shot mostly in the A7III, in portrait, family or couple photoshoots I usually shoot with uncompressed Raw. 4x tc) and having that urge to upgrade ahead of a Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony Alpha brand and related gear: Sony E Mount, Sony A Mount, legacy Minolta cameras, RX cameras, lenses, flashes, photoshare, and discussion. If you are in photo, the only thing you are looking at is improved weather sealing. With 16 bits per channel, you have significantly more data to work with, allowing for finer adjustments to color, exposure, and other image attributes without sacrificing image quality. The camera is at last leg of the shutter life. Works good in low light. As an aside, I think they’re too close and would go 35/85 if you went that way. On the other hand if buying Sony A7III won't burn a hole in your pocket, than it's a worthy upgrade for 700ish dollars imo! I’m just a hobbyist, but I’ve had the A7iii for almost 2 years now as my first full frame Sony and it makes me love going out and taking pictures. View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Don’t get me wrong I love taking photos with the iPhone, but because of pure physics it can never reach the image quality of a full-frame mirrorless camera like the A7iii. So if reliability and durability is a concern, the A7R iii will be better. I am a student and im lookin into buying a new hybrid camera. I take pictures using JPEG file format, then transfer the pictures to my phone to edit through apps like, Lightroom, Photoshop, and Facetune. Hey! I am looking for thoughts and opinions about the Sony A7iii camera for (near) professional filming? I see a lot of talk about the A7siii and A7iv- but omg they are $$$$$ are they really worth the jump in price for the video quality? do you think I can shoot high quality and professional looking footage on the A7iii? I own a Sony A7iii. I often pause and am impressed by the quality when opening videos - whereas the details in photos just seem to be a muddied mess. Reply reply MO, Canon has a way worse RF lens selection vs Sony, are more costly than their EF counterpart, doesn’t really allow third party lenses (which is super anti consumer) and not making either full frame small/tiny lightweight professionally fast focusing lenses (dual motors) - the 24mm f/2. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now I have found that the A7II and the A7III have very good image quality vs price metrics. I would never go Sony-only for pictures because the Sony pictures feel flat. This was Sony’s goal for a solid professional and affordable mirrorless camera with advanced af tech. A7r V. I am new to my Sony A7III after moving over from a Canon 6d. It's an excellent camera for hobbyists, though the single-slot makes it hard to recommend for In terms of image quality, the A7iii remains a top dog. You can attach the cheapest lens to the A7iii and it will still look better then the iPhone. (a7iii) Image quality/low light noise (probably a7iii, but it's mostly pixel peeping) Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! new or used. More buttons on the A7iii, although IMHO one doesn't need them as much on the A7c. I'm personally leaning towards the a7iii, just because I sometimes take photos, but I'm extremelyyyyyyy tempted by the fx30 as I mainly Unlike its predecessors, every video codec from the 10Bit 4k 60 - 1080 HD performs perfectly. Hello, New to photography and have a question. I filmed mostly as 50p with a 100 shutter for slow mo, though the A7s don't allow 50p at 4K so that was all at 25p with a 50 shutter and it's really not all that much better. If you are doing mix Sony really stepped up with the a7iii and it’s focus is still super good in my opinion. and there’s a handful more that make lenses of varying quality too. 500,000 actuations for the A7R iii, but only 200,000 for the A7 iii. 6 16-50mm (in post) and Sony 3. You could even use it as a B-camera with some of the smaller FF lenses available, for when your A7III is on a tripod, and you want to capture a fast moment. The image quality on my a74 is significantly noticeable side by side (8 bit vs 10 bit). Definitely buy used. It has a HUGE ISO range for low light conditions. The A7iii is also a great backup photo camera for your A7Riii. None of those are bad, and they are definitely a step I’m just a hobbyist, but I’ve had the A7iii for almost 2 years now as my first full frame Sony and it makes me love going out and taking pictures. The focus isn’t as sharp, and the overall image quality just doesn’t have that same wow factor. And it has 4k 60fps (firmware updated) which Sony A7III lacks. EVF bigger on the A7iii, but the flippy screen in the A7c is more useful. 8 zoom lenses for about $1400 less than I could get a Sony 24-70 and 70-200 f2. As far as manual lens Personally, as a Sony fanboy and owner of the A7iii I would go lean towards Blackmagic if you only intend to use it for video. The battery life, and megapixel drop are the most noticeable downsides compared to the A7iii, but it's nothing if you don't plan on utilizing them; and carry spare batteries. 05 cine lens. has the battery life significantly improved from the r2 to the r4? and has the photo quality We are a community that discusses all things Nikon cameras and lenses. The problem going with the a7iii is price, so if you're on a tight budget, maybe the a7iii isn't the best Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony Alpha brand and related gear: Sony E Mount, Sony A Mount, legacy Minolta cameras, RX cameras, lenses, flashes, photoshare, and discussion. 5 G and the Sony Tremendous. I guess it depends how often you plan on taking stills. decision! a6400 vs. The Sony a7iii is about $800 cheaper than the Canon r6 but it is like 2-3 years older and the canon has a better evf and daul pixel AF 2. Eventually I just sold the A7iii, the quality from the A7s iii is perfectly fine for web work - statistically, the majority people are going to be Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony Alpha brand and related gear: Sony E Mount, Sony A Mount, legacy Minolta cameras, RX cameras, lenses, flashes, photoshare, and discussion. The A7III works better if you have Sony/Minolta SSM lenses, with the LA-EA3 adapter. That being said, the skin color issues on the Sony are very exaggerated. And 8 bit just makes it harder to fix. (Sony A7III) and lens (Sony FE 200-600mm) for wildlife. If you do mostly photography, you will likely be happy with the A7III. 8 at 2000 iso. People asked- Sony a5000 w/ kit lens View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. (not to mention it feels better in the hand) but that $800 could go towards a lens. Or check it out in the app stores then yes, Lumix S5 has an image quality that Sony doesn't even dream to achieve. The a7iii and a7c cameras are both 24mp models that produce 6000x4000 photos. Any help would be appreciated. Image quality on the APS-C is better than the 1” sensor on the RX100VII, but the jump is smaller than the jump you see going A7iii, the battery life and heat issues of the A7sii really suck to deal with on longer video shoots and the low light on the A7iii is already really damn good. vs Sony A7III IBIS Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony Alpha brand and related gear: Sony E Mount, Sony A Mount, legacy Minolta Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony Alpha brand and related gear: Sony E Mount, Sony A Mount, legacy Minolta cameras, RX cameras, lenses, flashes, photoshare, and discussion. If you’re not already invested in the Sony ecosystem. AF in the A7c is uncanny and feels like cheating at times, although the A7iii's no slouch either. The A7sii carries a visually more appealing EVF. (lossy compressed has been shown in some rare circumstances to affect image quality). My advice, skip on the a7ii since it’s older. 24-105 image quality is better than 28-200 by any metric. The photos which look the worst are being taken at ISO 8000 and 1/8000 and f22. 8. Seen I love my A7iii but I'm just not that happy with my exported image quality. The gh5 is a level up in terms of image quality and film making functionality. 8, Sony 16-35mm f/4 PZ). Aurora Borealis Sony Honestly, they were some of the best photos I’ve ever taken. If lenses aren’t a factor though, I’d probably get the S5ii over the a7iii. I use my A7iii for photos and video and I'm pretty happy with it. But, Sony A7II is better bang for buck if your only priority is solely Image Quality. Some thoughts: Identical sensor. However, I eventually opted for the Sony A7 III because it has better light sensitivity; it’s better for low light, sports, and wildlife and offers deeper burst depths. It’s basically the same camera, but the video side has been upgraded software wise. Regarding your questions: I feel like the screen on the A7C II is definitely a step up in quality compared to the A7III's screen, but the viewfinder looks a bit worse IMO. A7c if you are doing video. Have been shooting for several days but i am really dissatisfied with Maybe just me, but my video quality seems fine. Last time I wanted to buy nikon z6ii but I chose to wait for Sony A7IV because of fast AF, more lens selection and also A7IV's color science gets better comparing with A7III. Plus, it shoots amazing 4k video. The A7III is awesome. The A7iii takes good and fast shots, but I think the focus issue is more about User experience with Nikon AF system; Nikon has a steeper learning curve, but is overwhelmingly the same for experienced users of both systems. 6 28-70mm (in comments) ***I have now tried resetting factory settings, cleaning the sensor with a blower and using the self cleaning on camera, and all three of my lenses are still not If you absolutely need, Eye Autofocus, Usb-C Charging, Better Higher ISO performance and a Stellar Battery Life go for Sony A7III. It is so far the best camera Sony has ever made. Sounds like GAS - you can spend your money on a new body and get marginal improvements in image quality (for the most part) and potentially a fair bit of quality of life improvements, you can spend money on new lenses and generally get way more improvement in image quality, or, you can spend the money on putting something worthwhile in front of I say go with the a7iii. It all looks great, and the picture profiles are also well tuned. No matter what settings I use, and trust me I've tried so many, I cannot seem to get sharp images like other can. I have few images that I shot with a7iii 85mm 1. My friend says that these cheap filters are damaging my image quality, and I should be spending about 10% of the cost Generally speaking, the cameras are all, going to produce amazing images. There are just so many quality of life improvements which adds up into quite a huge upgrade. The A7iii does have more AF points and Sony has more experience building mirrorless AF. I have worked with the a7III before and i know how to use it fairly well. The small size and compatibility with your Sony FF glass means that the space cost of the backup is very small. The A7R iii shutter is of a higher quality and rated for a lot more actuations than the A7 iii one. If you were to get a new FX30 and a used A7iii in good condition you would end Sony a7r V photos are a bit soft . CA on that tamron lens is really bad. Feel free to ask a question, or post a photo taken with your Nikon camera and lens. The photo i post is edited, View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. The 20mm is wide enough usually for landscapes, and you get 40mm 2. a7 III . The A7III is a good bit outdated. mfam hbq qvup nqvqdx fkucna bqbfom aydldj ott aqfib hyncw